Search results

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • Mackenzie was promoted to the rank of {{LieutRNR}} on 25 September, 1934.{{UBAlly|1589}} ...zie served in {{UK-Whitshed}} immediately before the war and then in the {{UK-Venomous|f=cp}} from 18 April, 1940.
    2 KB (225 words) - 15:37, 7 April 2022
  • ...the new flotilla mentioned is this one, as it is based in Lamlash}} Prior to February, 1914, it was known as the '''Lamlash Submarine Flotilla'''.{{AWO1 ...some point between July and September 1916, it was re-designated as the {{UK-SF|7}}.
    37 KB (4,757 words) - 15:10, 19 January 2022
  • The flotilla was comprised of two depot ships and seventeen modern submarines.{{AWO1914|109 of 10 July, 1914}} |align=center colspan=6|'''Depot Ships'''
    43 KB (5,607 words) - 15:11, 19 January 2022
  • ...ps too risky. This meant that he had to position his [[Grand Fleet]] so as to intercept the [[High Sea Fleet]], commanded by Admiral [[Reinhard Scheer]], ...hannel through the minefield, which was a 135 mile journey but was unknown to the Germans. Jellicoe thought that the Ems route was the most likely becaus
    7 KB (1,135 words) - 22:09, 1 September 2022
  • ...modore [Roger John Brownlow Keyes, First Baron Keyes|Keyes]] in operations to protect the Belgian coast.<ref>See [[Southern Force (Royal Navy)]].</ref> The roster is comprised of ships taken from the Seventh Flotilla. It would, like the Seventh, operate initi
    25 KB (3,358 words) - 21:50, 24 March 2021
  • ...ransferring to {{UK-Suffolk}} in the Channel and then {{UK-Kent}} of the {{UK-CS}} before the end of the year. He left ''Kent'' when she paid off on 23 Newill was promoted to the rank of {{LieutRN}} on 31 December, 1909.<ref>Newill Service Record. {
    8 KB (1,106 words) - 15:52, 7 April 2022
  • ...t receive news of the battle favourably, a fact substantially attributable to the lofty expectations they'd developed for a force as expensive as the Gra ...n warranted, at least in initial accounts, as continuing efforts were made to discover and enumerate true injuries inflicted upon the enemy.
    7 KB (1,122 words) - 22:05, 1 September 2022
  • <div name=fredbot:ships> | {{Template:UK-Drake}}
    9 KB (1,237 words) - 19:30, 6 April 2018
  • ...ce the squadron intercepted 12,979 ships at sea while 2,039 ships reported to a port of examination. 642 evaded the blockade. The losses incurred were ...dbot:office0 otitle="Rear-Admiral Commanding, Tenth Cruiser Squadron" nat="UK">
    45 KB (5,700 words) - 23:55, 1 April 2021
  • ...vision of the [[Home Fleet (Royal Navy)|Home Fleet]] (soon to become the {{UK-BS|2}} of the [[Home Fleets (Royal Navy)|Home Fleets]]).<ref>Jellicoe Paper ...d in the War Orders was not attached to this draft and its whereabouts are unknown.
    16 KB (2,813 words) - 18:52, 12 October 2016
  • ...Seventh Cruiser Squadron''', also known as '''Cruiser Force C''' from 1914 to 1915, was a cruiser formation of the [[Royal Navy]]. ...ot:office0 otitle="Rear-Admiral Commanding, Seventh Cruiser Squadron" nat="UK">
    7 KB (887 words) - 14:51, 12 March 2021
  • ...rom {{UK-Chester}} later, presumably because she'd been so badly mauled. {{UK-Chatham}} was "not applicable", as she had struck a mine and was under repa ...four light cruisers, with another detached to screen the {{UK-BCS|3}}. {{UK-Engadine|f=t}} operated in a detached manner.{{UKJutlandOD|pp. 33, 46}}
    26 KB (4,210 words) - 17:13, 31 May 2017
  • On 24 March 1893, Wintour was appointed to ''Seaflower'' for navigating duties. For seven years, his naval command wo Wintour was promoted to the rank of {{LieutRN}} on 30 June, 1894.<ref>Wintour Service Record. {{TN
    10 KB (1,407 words) - 16:51, 7 April 2022
  • ...lotilla were, along with the destroyers of several early classes, approved to receive "alarm circuits".{{ARTS1917|p. 232}} ...the Test Mobilisation.{{AWO1914|109 of 10 July, 1914}} These vessels were to long comprise the bulk of this formation.
    50 KB (6,326 words) - 17:11, 21 December 2021
  • ...e 104 torpedo test runs in the first half of that year proved 91% probable to endanger the enemy.{{ARTS1916|p. 87}} ...ay be incorrectly identified as a member of the flotilla, that photo seems to show:{{March|caption Photo 20/1}}
    42 KB (5,345 words) - 15:51, 30 April 2023
  • ===Captain's Report, H.M.S. "{{UK-Valiant}}"=== .../small> compliance with your signal of to-day, 2nd June, I have the honour to report as follows on the action of 31st May 1916. All times shown in this r
    18 KB (3,003 words) - 14:25, 11 May 2017
  • ...{UK-DF|12}} screened the [[Grand Fleet]] in the battle, working with the {{UK-DF|4}}. * {{UK-1Faulknor|f=t}}, Captain (D) [[Anselan John Buchanan Stirling|Anselan Stirl
    21 KB (3,343 words) - 22:36, 5 April 2020
  • ...nport, where its roster of destroyers grew to enormous levels, reaching 50 ships in July, 1918. ...rs) and "[[Cricket Class Torpedo Boat (1906)|Coastals]]". It was assigned to the Third Division of the Home Fleet.{{NLApr10|p. 269''a''}}
    67 KB (8,359 words) - 15:47, 30 April 2023
  • ...royers]] of the [[Royal Navy]]. The flotilla changed composition often as ships were damaged, retired or transferred. ...me=fredbot:officecaptD otitle="Captain (D), Sixth Destroyer Flotilla" nat="UK">
    110 KB (13,715 words) - 15:49, 30 April 2023
  • ...t year resulted in shots that were 79%, 82% and 80% likely to be dangerous to the enemy.{{ARTS1916|p. 87}} ...rs) and "[[Cricket Class Torpedo Boat (1906)|Coastals]]". It was assigned to the Third Division of the Home Fleet.{{NLApr10|p. 269''a''}}
    86 KB (10,624 words) - 15:48, 30 April 2023

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)