Difference between revisions of "Committee on Designs"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page on Committee on Designs)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In October 1904 the Committee on Design was appointed by [[William Waldegrave Palmer | Lord Selborne]] in order to consider the characteristics of the new type of ships the navy would be building in the coming decade and hence to formulate the designs of the first all-big-gun battleship and armoured cruisers.  The committee would be presided over by [[Admiral Fisher]] with committee members being appointed between November 1904 and January 1905.  As a result of the timing of the committee members, the committee would include the newly-appointed Third Sea Lord and Controller of the Navy, [[Henry Bradwardine Jackson | Captain Henry Jackson]], and hence omitting his predecessor [[William Henry May | William May]].  Another member of the committee and one who would play a key role in proceedings was [[John Rushworth Jellicoe]], in advance of his appointment as [[Director of Naval Ordnance and Torpedoes]] a month later in February 1905.  Other committee members included [[Charles Edward Madden]].
+
In October 1904 the Committee on Design was appointed by [[William Waldegrave Palmer | Lord Selborne]] in order to consider the characteristics of the new type of ships the navy would be building in the coming decade and hence to formulate the designs of the first all-big-gun battleship and armoured cruisers.  The committee would be presided over by [[Admiral Fisher]] with committee members being appointed between November 1904 and January 1905.  As a result of the timing of the committee members, the committee would include the newly-appointed Third Sea Lord and Controller of the Navy, [[Henry Bradwardine Jackson | Captain Henry Jackson]], and hence omitting his predecessor [[William Henry May | William May]].  Another member of the committee and one who would play a key role in proceedings was [[John Rushworth Jellicoe]], in advance of his appointment as [[Director of Naval Ordnance and Torpedoes]] a month later in February 1905.  Other committee members included [[Charles Edward Madden, First Baronet|Charles Edward Madden]].
  
The main recommendation of the committee was the adoption of the battle-cruiser, a recommendation agreed to by the Admiralty leading to the construction of HMS Dreadnought in 1905 and the further construction of HMS Indomitable, HMS Invincible, and HMS Inflexible in 1906.<ref>Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 227-228.</ref>  HMS Dreadnought is generally credited to [[Admiral Fisher]] and it has been suggested by some that one purpose of the committee was to ''was that it would shield [Fisher], and the Admiralty, from political charges that they had not consulted leading experts before designing such a radically different battleship [such as HMS Dreadnought]''.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dreadnought_%281906%29</ref>  The committee also made secondary recommendations with regard to the first large ocean-going destroyers, again implemented by the Admiralty.<ref>Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 266.</ref>
+
The main recommendation of the committee was the adoption of the battle-cruiser, a recommendation agreed to by the Admiralty leading to the construction of {{UK-Dreadnought|f=p}} in 1905 and the further construction of {{UK-Indomitable}}, {{UK-Invincible}}, and {{UK-Inflexible}} in 1906.<ref>Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 227-228.</ref>  ''Dreadnought'' is generally credited to [[Admiral Fisher]] and it has been suggested by some that one purpose of the committee was to ''was that it would shield [Fisher], and the Admiralty, from political charges that they had not consulted leading experts before designing such a radically different battleship [such as HMS Dreadnought]''.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dreadnought_%281906%29</ref>  The committee also made secondary recommendations with regard to the first large ocean-going destroyers, again implemented by the Admiralty.<ref>Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 266.</ref>
  
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 14:53, 8 May 2014

In October 1904 the Committee on Design was appointed by Lord Selborne in order to consider the characteristics of the new type of ships the navy would be building in the coming decade and hence to formulate the designs of the first all-big-gun battleship and armoured cruisers. The committee would be presided over by Admiral Fisher with committee members being appointed between November 1904 and January 1905. As a result of the timing of the committee members, the committee would include the newly-appointed Third Sea Lord and Controller of the Navy, Captain Henry Jackson, and hence omitting his predecessor William May. Another member of the committee and one who would play a key role in proceedings was John Rushworth Jellicoe, in advance of his appointment as Director of Naval Ordnance and Torpedoes a month later in February 1905. Other committee members included Charles Edward Madden.

The main recommendation of the committee was the adoption of the battle-cruiser, a recommendation agreed to by the Admiralty leading to the construction of H.M.S. Dreadnought in 1905 and the further construction of Indomitable, Invincible, and Inflexible in 1906.[1] Dreadnought is generally credited to Admiral Fisher and it has been suggested by some that one purpose of the committee was to was that it would shield [Fisher], and the Admiralty, from political charges that they had not consulted leading experts before designing such a radically different battleship [such as HMS Dreadnought].[2] The committee also made secondary recommendations with regard to the first large ocean-going destroyers, again implemented by the Admiralty.[3]

Footnotes

  1. Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 227-228.
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dreadnought_%281906%29
  3. Hovgaard, William. Modern History of Warships: Comprising a Discussion of Present Standpoint: 266.