Search results

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • |[[Vickers]], Barrow-in-Furness According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}}
    16 KB (2,438 words) - 08:00, 6 August 2021
  • According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.<ref>ARTS 1908 Wireless Appendix, p. 13.</ref The ten 12-in guns were Mark XI mounted in B. XII turrets. The mountings could elevate 15 degrees and
    16 KB (2,311 words) - 11:14, 28 July 2023
  • According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}} The ten 13.5-in Mark V(L) guns were in Mark II (or Mark II*) mountings. The sights were similar to those in {{UK-Lion}} and {{UK-P
    21 KB (3,169 words) - 09:23, 27 March 2020
  • According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}} * Gunnery Control Tower: 4 inches
    23 KB (3,510 words) - 18:57, 27 October 2022
  • |[[Vickers]] ...uld not be the same. She draws over 33 ft forward at this moment although I have got rid of 600 tons of oil. She is very wet indeed.<br>The <u>next</u
    25 KB (3,847 words) - 11:12, 10 February 2022
  • ...s might be called ''Acadia'', ''Ontario'', and ''Quebec''.<ref>Tucker. '''I'''. p. 188.</ref> ...rst Sea Lord when she was designed, wrote to his friend Jack Sandars that "I regard her & her sister ships as my special children."<ref>Bridgeman to San
    34 KB (5,381 words) - 08:50, 29 March 2020
  • |[[Vickers]] According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}}
    30 KB (4,533 words) - 08:55, 29 March 2020
  • According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}} ...ets. The mountings could elevate 13.5 degrees and depress 5 degrees.<ref>I assume the B. VIII* elevation is as in the B VIII</ref>
    14 KB (1,996 words) - 20:42, 13 September 2021
  • |[[Vickers]] According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}}
    19 KB (2,813 words) - 14:29, 6 April 2018
  • According to the ambitions of 1909, these ships had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.<ref>ARTS 1908 Wireless Appendix, p. 13.</ref * six 15-in Mark I B.L. guns in three twin turrets
    18 KB (2,721 words) - 20:43, 13 September 2021
  • ...the 885 in the {{DE-Blucher}} &c..<br>Yours truly<br>Fisher<br>25.1.15<br>I asked Crease to see you with a very rough memorandum of mine. Please expla <blockquote>The late Lord Fisher came into my room one day and said: "I have just been having a long talk with the Chancellor of the Exchequer." M
    28 KB (4,383 words) - 20:44, 13 September 2021
  • ...is found in ARTS up to that date, and they are found in 1890's edition and I have not seen 1886-1889. Here is a list of numbers I have seen referenced in primary sources. {{TONE}}
    74 KB (10,213 words) - 15:05, 10 November 2016
  • ...eet (Royal Navy)|Engineer-in-Chief of the Fleet]] noted that Armstrong and Vickers had "taken the 12-inch gun machinery started for the "Lord Nelson" class an ...ansmitting (only?) on "S", "U" and "W" tunes. It was to receive a Service Mark II set in 1909.<ref>ARTS 1908 Wireless Appendix, p. 13.</ref>
    32 KB (4,764 words) - 18:02, 11 October 2022
  • ...{{UK-BS|1}} during the battle. She suffered no damage and contributed to fire against the {{DE-Wiesbaden|f=tp}}. This ship probably had [[Service Gear Mark II]] wireless upon completion.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}}
    20 KB (2,920 words) - 09:16, 9 June 2022
  • The 12-in guns were Mark VIII, though the turrets used differed by ship:{{TheSightM|p. 109}} ...pedo models in use were the {{Torp|18-in Mark IV|UK}} and the {{Torp|14-in Mark IX|UK}}.{{ARTS1895|p. 27}}
    12 KB (1,688 words) - 09:26, 4 April 2020
  • |[[Vickers]], Barrow ...designated "fore" and "aft".<ref>''Manual of Gunnery in H.M. Fleet (Volume I), 1907'', p. 2.</ref> Different ships carried different mountings, and thos
    13 KB (1,883 words) - 13:08, 9 April 2018
  • ...guns were also surrendered due to this alteration.{{UKTHVol4Part36|p. 9. I am inferring here that this class was treated as part of ''London'', ''Dunc ...as selected as being a better choice for the shorter ranges at which rapid fire would be most suitable (about 4,000 yards here), and it sped the firing cyc
    12 KB (1,741 words) - 09:06, 16 May 2018
  • ...designated "Fore" and "Aft".<ref>''Manual of Gunnery in H.M. Fleet (Volume I), 1907'', pp. 1, 2.</ref> However, some vessels had twin B. VI mountings a * twelve 6-in B.L. Mark VII guns
    14 KB (1,966 words) - 14:58, 1 August 2017
  • ...designated "Fore" and "Aft".<ref>''Manual of Gunnery in H.M. Fleet (Volume I), 1907'', pp. 1, 2.</ref> However, some vessels had twin B. VI mountings a Originally, the ship was provided twelve 6-in/45 B.L. Mark VII guns, eight in casemates and four on the upper deck. During the war, t
    17 KB (2,420 words) - 16:13, 28 January 2020
  • |[[Vickers]] ...ing on "S", "U" and "W" tunes. Those two were slated to receive a Service Mark II set in 1909.{{ARTS1908|Wireless Appendix, p. 13}}
    23 KB (3,226 words) - 15:30, 6 April 2018

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)