Difference between revisions of "Wise Pressure Telegraphy System"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Original Concept==
 
==Original Concept==
It was a Ouija board, in effect.
 
 
 
The system was a simple one of using a hydraulic medium of half glycerine and half water to communicate between stations.  The transmitter was a screw-valve and a repeat indicating gauge, and one or more remote indicating gauges to act as receivers.  In effect, the man working the transmitter could indicate the meaning of any one of a number of messages arrayed around the circumference of the identical gauge dials.
 
The system was a simple one of using a hydraulic medium of half glycerine and half water to communicate between stations.  The transmitter was a screw-valve and a repeat indicating gauge, and one or more remote indicating gauges to act as receivers.  In effect, the man working the transmitter could indicate the meaning of any one of a number of messages arrayed around the circumference of the identical gauge dials.
  

Revision as of 12:00, 8 May 2011

Wise's Pressure Telegraphy System[1]

Wise's Pressure Telegraphy System was an hydraulically actuated system of remotely indicating fire and torpedo control information between different stations on a ship.

It was based on existing patents held by Engineer Lieutenant Commander A. S. Wise and adapted by Engineer Lieutenant Commander F. S. Carlisle of H.M.S. Morris, a new ship which lacked a means of communicating ranges from the bridge to guns.[2]

Original Concept

The system was a simple one of using a hydraulic medium of half glycerine and half water to communicate between stations. The transmitter was a screw-valve and a repeat indicating gauge, and one or more remote indicating gauges to act as receivers. In effect, the man working the transmitter could indicate the meaning of any one of a number of messages arrayed around the circumference of the identical gauge dials.

The first installation used only rigid piping, which placed some limitations on where the gauges could be placed. It proved highly reliable in nine months of service under all weather conditions.[3]

Adapted for Torpedo Control

Gauge Face for Torpedo Control, as proposed in 1915[4]
The design was changed to separate gauges for deflection and orders prior to adoption.

By the end of 1915, Captain (D) of the Tenth Destroyer Flotilla (Captain Wilmot S. Nicholson) had suggested that the system be adapted for torpedo control. Under this scheme, the dial's indications were no longer a simple scalar, as it was when conveying ranges, but had several regions for various purposes. Rather, the dial was as shown to the right, allowing enemy inclination, enemy speed, and simple training and firing orders to be communicated.

An initial "Type A" design with below-deck piping proved to be too slow to transmit orders, prone to leaking, and tiring to work. A follow-on "Type B" kept the piping above deck and featured a larger transmitting pump displacement, a smaller hand wheel to work, and illuminated dials.[5]

In 1916, twenty such sets (Types A and B) were fitted for trial:[6]

Type A
Inconstant Nepean Nereus Partridge
Type B
Caroline Phaeton Galatea Royalist
Aurora Carysfort Undaunted Radstock
Pasley Patriot Meteor Mentor
Morris Loyal Lance Laertes

Performance

By the end of 1916, the "Type B" systems seemed a substantial, but not complete success. Gauges sometimes got out of step, or the needles vibrated, but pressurizing the fluid and greater care in assembly seemed to help.

It was resolved to modify them to support the shift to deflection aiming by removing enemy speed and inclination in favor of torpedo deflection, and to use a second, separate network for conveying orders so the one indication would not have to fly between the various uses.[7]

See Also

Footnotes

  1. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1915, Figure 1, p. 243.
  2. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1915, pp. 242-243.
  3. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1915, p. 244.
  4. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1915, Figure 2, p. 243.
  5. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916, p. 3!.
  6. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916, p. 30.
  7. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916, p. 31.

Bibliography