|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | | | |
| | ==History== | | ==History== |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Battle of Jutland=== |
| | + | :{{Main|Thirteenth D.F. at the Battle of Jutland}} |
| | Ten destroyers of the Thirteenth under the lead of the {{UK-Champion|f=t}} screened the {{UK-BCS|1}} during the battle, bolstered by two destroyers temporarily detached from the {{UK-DF|10}}. Eight of these vessels delivered a torpedo attack against the enemy battle cruisers at about 4.15pm, after gun and torpedo battle with enemy destroyers who were similarly tasked. | | Ten destroyers of the Thirteenth under the lead of the {{UK-Champion|f=t}} screened the {{UK-BCS|1}} during the battle, bolstered by two destroyers temporarily detached from the {{UK-DF|10}}. Eight of these vessels delivered a torpedo attack against the enemy battle cruisers at about 4.15pm, after gun and torpedo battle with enemy destroyers who were similarly tasked. |
| | | | |
| Line 27: |
Line 30: |
| | | | |
| | At the same time, {{UK-Nepean}} remained in harbour and {{UK-Paladin}}, {{UK-Negro}}, {{UK-Nereus}}, {{UK-Penn}} and {{UK-Penn}} were in dockyard hands.{{UKNavalOpsIII|p. 430}} | | At the same time, {{UK-Nepean}} remained in harbour and {{UK-Paladin}}, {{UK-Negro}}, {{UK-Nereus}}, {{UK-Penn}} and {{UK-Penn}} were in dockyard hands.{{UKNavalOpsIII|p. 430}} |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Champion==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | On 3 June, Captain (D) [[James Uchtred Farie|James U. Farie]] issued a report from his flagship.{{UKJutlandOD|pp. 224-225}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | No. 60.
| |
| − | ::::::::::H.M.S. "Champion,"
| |
| − | :::::::::::::3rd June 1916.
| |
| − | SIR,
| |
| − | :I HAVE the honour to forward the following report of
| |
| − | Proceedings of H.M.S. " Champion " and 13th Destroyer Flotilla
| |
| − | during the recent action of the 31st May–lst June 1916.
| |
| − | :2. At 2.50 p.m., 31st May, H.M.S. " Onslow "and " Moresby "
| |
| − | were detached to join H.M.S. "Engadine," but attacked enemy
| |
| − | Battle Cruiser Fleet with remainder of Flotilla, as described in
| |
| − | paragraph 5.
| |
| − | :3. At commencement of action station was taken up on the
| |
| − | starboard bow of .H.M.S. "Lion," Destroyers in company
| |
| − | being :—
| |
| − | :::" Nestor " - Commander Hon. Edward B. S.
| |
| − | ::::::Bingham.
| |
| − | :::" Nomad " Lieut. Commander Paul Whitfield.
| |
| − | :::" Narborough "- JP Geoffrey Corlett.
| |
| − | :::" Obdurate " tt Cecil H. H. Sams.
| |
| − | :::" Petard " 13 3/ Evelyn C. O. Thomson.
| |
| − | :::" Pelican " 3t Kenneth A. Beattie.
| |
| − | :::" Nerissa " Montague C. B. Legge.
| |
| − | ::: " Onslow "1 )3 John C. Tovey.
| |
| − | :::"Moresby "1 tt PP Roger V. Alison.
| |
| − | :::" Nicator " Lieutenant Jack E. A. Mocatta.
| |
| − | :::" Termagant " Lieut. Commander Cuthbert P. Blake.
| |
| − | :::" Turbulent " - Dudley Stuart.
| |
| − | :::(The last two named Destroyers being temporarily attached.)
| |
| − | :4. At 4.30 p.m. Enemy's Battle Fleet was sighted by
| |
| − | " Champion " and reported to you.
| |
| − | :5. At 4.15 p.m. the whole Flotilla was ordered to attack
| |
| − | Enemy Battle Cruiser Fleet. This attack was well carried out,
| |
| − | and it is thought that at least two Enemy Destroyers were sunk.
| |
| − | I regret to state that H.M.S. " Nestor " (Commander Hon.
| |
| − | E. B. S. Bingham) and H.M.S. " Nomad " (Lieutenant Commander
| |
| − | Paul Whitfield) did not return from this action, and must be
| |
| − | considered to have been sunk.
| |
| − | :6. At 7.45 p.m. H.M.S. " Onslow " was reported unable to
| |
| − | steam, and was taken in tow by H.M.S. "Defender."
| |
| − | :7. No further opportunity of attacking Enemy occurred
| |
| − | during. the day.
| |
| − | :8. At night station was taken astern of Battle Fleet, course
| |
| − | South. About 11.30 p.m. heavy firing was opened on our
| |
| − | starboard beam, apparently at some of our Destroyers between
| |
| − | the 13th Flotilla and the enemy. I hauled out to the eastward
| |
| − | as I was unable to attack with any of our own Flotilla, our own
| |
| − | forces being between me and the Enemy. I then resumed course
| |
| − | South ; firing was observed at intervals during the night on
| |
| − | our starboard beam. Destroyers of the 13th Flotilla, with the
| |
| − | exception of H.M.S. " Obdurate " and "Moresby," lost touch
| |
| − | with me during the night. H.M.S. " Narborough " as Senior
| |
| − | Officer, reports that he took charge IA the remainder, and rejoined
| |
| − | the Fleet at 9.45 a.m. on the 1st instant.
| |
| − | :H.M.S. " Marksman " and " Maenad " joined me at about
| |
| − | 2.30 a.m. At 2.50 a.m. course was altered to North to conform
| |
| − | with signal received from the Commander-in-Chief.
| |
| − | :9. At 3.25 a.m. four Destroyers, steering southward, were
| |
| − | sighted ; owing to the mist I was uncertain at first who they
| |
| − | were ; but at 3.30 a.m. I made them out to be the enemy, and
| |
| − | opened fire, range about 3,600 yards. Two torpedoes were
| |
| − | fired at "Champion," the first one passing under our bows, the
| |
| − | second just missing close astern. Enemy passed on opposite
| |
| − | course, and when ship had been steadied after avoiding torpedoes,
| |
| − | the enemy had disappeared in the mist, and I resumed my same
| |
| − | course.
| |
| − | :10. At 4.30 a.m. H.M.S. " Obdurate " picked up two
| |
| − | survivors, and H.M.S. " Marksman " one survivor, from H.M.S.
| |
| − | " Ardent."
| |
| − | :At 5 a.m. two rafts were sighted, and H.M.S. " Moresby "
| |
| − | rescued seven men, and H.M.S. " Maenad " eleven men, survivors
| |
| − | from H.M.S. "Fortune."
| |
| − | :11. At about 6 a.m. H.M.S. " Marksman " was detached to
| |
| − | examine vessel to westward, which appeared to be a disabled
| |
| − | Destroyer, and lost touch with me. Nothing further occurred,
| |
| − | and I returned to base, by your orders, arriving at 3.30 p.m.,
| |
| − | 2nd June 1910.
| |
| − | :12. Letter of Proceedings from H.M.S. " Narborough," the
| |
| − | Senior Officer surviving from Destroyer attack, is attached.
| |
| − | Reports have been called for from remainder of 13th Flotilla,
| |
| − | and an addendum to this letter will be forwarded when the
| |
| − | reports have been collected.
| |
| − | :13. In addition to loss of H.M.S. " Nestor " and "Nomad,"
| |
| − | H.M.S. " Turbulent " '(Lieutenant-Commander Dudley Stuart)
| |
| − | is reported by H.M.S. " Narborough " to have been lost sight of
| |
| − | at 0.30 a.m. on the 1st instant, and was probably rammed, or
| |
| − | sunk by gunfire.
| |
| − | Total casualties and names have not yet been ascertained.
| |
| − | {{JODSig|J. U. Farie|13th Flotilla|The Vice-Admiral Commanding|Battle Cruiser Fleet, H.M.S. " Lion."}}
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | On the 7th, Farie forwarded a collection of reports from his flotilla destroyers he'd collected in the previous days, as follows.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Obdurate==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 3rd June.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 226}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :On receiving the signal to carry out torpedo attack on enemy
| |
| − | battle cruiser fleet, Obdurate turned towards the enemy
| |
| − | and soon became engaged with their destroyers and one light
| |
| − | cruiser. Range varied from 6,000 to 3,000 yards, and during the
| |
| − | destroyer action one of the enemy's destroyers was blown up
| |
| − | and two others badly damaged; probably one of these two sank
| |
| − | as the guns firing at her lost sight of her.
| |
| − | :The enemy destroyers and light cruiser were driven back to
| |
| − | the protection of their big ships, and " Obdurate " was then too
| |
| − | far astern to deliver a torpedo attack. " Obdurate " was hit
| |
| − | twice by a 4.1 shell, but suffered no casualties.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Petard==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 2nd June.{{UKJutlandOD|pp. 226, 227}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :On receiving the signal to attack with torpedoes, I attacked
| |
| − | with H.M.S. "Turbulent." The first torpedo fired was set for
| |
| − | high speed, six feet deep, and was aimed at the bead of the
| |
| − | German destroyer flotilla, which was crossing over to meet our
| |
| − | attack. The track was closely followed, and tube's crew state
| |
| − | that they undoubtedly saw it hit a German Destroyer about
| |
| − | amidships and explode. I opened fire with my gun on this
| |
| − | destroyer a few minutes later, and she was then lying stopped,
| |
| − | with her upper deck awash and obviously sinking.
| |
| − | :" Petard " then took part in the general engagement with
| |
| − | the German Destroyers, and the three remaining torpedoes were
| |
| − | fired at a range of about 7,000 yards on the bow of the German
| |
| − | Battle Cruiser Fleet. All these torpedoes must have crossed
| |
| − | the track of the German line.
| |
| − | :At 12.15 a.m. course was altered to S.W. by W., and ten
| |
| − | minutes later the line crossed ahead of a division of German
| |
| − | Battleships. I sighted the leading battleship about six points
| |
| − | on my starboard bow steering S.E. at about 400 or 500 yards.
| |
| − | This ship switched on recognition lights, consisting of two red
| |
| − | over one white light and, as some destroyer ahead of me in the
| |
| − | line then switched on her "fighting lights," I think the Germans
| |
| − | at once knew we were enemy. As " Petard " had no torpedoes
| |
| − | left I could not attack, so I increased to full speed, and altered
| |
| − | course slightly to port to avoid being rammed. I passed about
| |
| − | 200 yards ahead of the German ship, who appeared to be one
| |
| − | of the " Wittelsbach " class. As soon as we were clear of her
| |
| − | stem, she illuminated us with searchlights, and we came under
| |
| − | a heavy fire from her and the next ship in the line. Two salvoes
| |
| − | seemed to strike us, and, in all, I think, we received six hits.
| |
| − | :I regret that I never saw " {{UK-1Turbulent}}," who was in station
| |
| − | astern of " Petard," after passing the German Squadron ;
| |
| − | according to the evidence of some of my Ship's Company, I
| |
| − | am afraid she must have been rammed and sunk.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Pelican==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 4th June.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 227}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :" Pelican " was unable to fire torpedoes owing to the other
| |
| − | two divisions being engaged by enemy torpedo craft between
| |
| − | the fleets, and by a division of the 9th Flotilla, who were coming
| |
| − | up in the opposite direction.
| |
| − | :At about 10.35 p.m. there was heavy firing in N. Westerly
| |
| − | direction, and destroyers were seen in the searchlight rays of
| |
| − | attacking ships. Shortly afterwards there was a huge explosion
| |
| − | in that direction. At 0.40, June 1st, when on a course S.W.,
| |
| − | speed 30 knots, I observed two ships on starboard quarter,
| |
| − | which were at first taken to be our Light Cruisers. They switched
| |
| − | on three vertical lights, the upper two being red and lower green,
| |
| − | at the same time " Pelican's " stem was lit up by a searchlight
| |
| − | which was immediately transferred to " Petard" and " Turbu-
| |
| − | lent," who were astern. When sighted position was unfavourable
| |
| − | for attack.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Nerissa==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 5th June.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 227}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :4.30 p.m., commenced attack on a northerly course, owing
| |
| − | to enemy turning 16 points, this attack had eventually to be
| |
| − | carried out on a southerly course, which I did in company with
| |
| − | " {{UK-Termagant}}," but firing two torpedoes, range 7,000 yards.
| |
| − | Just previous to this attack " {{UK-Nomad}} " was observed quite
| |
| − | close, stopped and apparently badly damaged in the engine
| |
| − | room. One torpedo apparently took effect on rear ship.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Onslow==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 2nd June.{{UKJutlandOD|pp. 227-8}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :At about 6.5 p.m., sighting an enemy Light Cruiser, class
| |
| − | uncertain, with 3 funnels, with topgallant forecastle only about
| |
| − | 6,000 yards from 1st B.C.S., I decided to attack her. All guns
| |
| − | engaged enemy Light Cruiser, and 58 rounds were fired at a
| |
| − | range of 2,000 to 4,000 yards ; undoubtedly a large number of
| |
| − | hits were scored, as they were easily spotted at this range. I
| |
| − | then gave orders for all torpedoes to be fired. I saw the first
| |
| − | torpedo leave the ship, and immediately was struck by a big
| |
| − | shell amidships the starboard side. There was a big escape of
| |
| − | steam, completely enveloping both torpedo tubes. Sub-Lieu-
| |
| − | tenant Moore, Leading Signalman Cassin, also several other
| |
| − | ratings and myself saw the torpedo hit Light Cruiser below
| |
| − | conning tower, and explode.
| |
| − | :Owing to two shells having exploded in No. 2 Boiler room,
| |
| − | and badly damaged main feed tank and all the water in the
| |
| − | reserve feed tank being now used, at 7.0 p.m. ship stopped and
| |
| − | electric current was lost. At 7.15 p.m. " Defender " closed
| |
| − | " Onslow " and asked if assistance was required. On learning
| |
| − | " Defender " could only steam 10 knots, I asked to be taken in
| |
| − | tow whilst endeavouring to effect repairs; this " {{UK-Defender}} "
| |
| − | did under very trying circumstances, and with large enemy
| |
| − | ships rapidly approaching. In tow of " {{UK-Defender}} " I then
| |
| − | proceeded W. by N. Using salt-water feed, Engineer Lieutenant
| |
| − | Commander Foulkes raised speed for slow speed to enable me
| |
| − | to use steering engine, and when weather got worse to lessen
| |
| − | strain on towing hawser. Owing to ship's condition I decided
| |
| − | to make for the nearest port—Aberdeen—arriving there about
| |
| − | 1.0 p.m. the 2nd June.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Moresby==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 3rd June.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 228}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :At 5.0 p.m. an enemy Dreadnought squadron then observed
| |
| − | steering Northward was attacked. At 5.10 p.m., being two
| |
| − | points before the beam of the leading ship 6-8,000 yards, a long
| |
| − | range torpedo was fired at the third ship. About 8 minutes later
| |
| − | I observed an upheaval due to a torpedo, and am informed it
| |
| − | was on the 6th ship. This agrees with the director setting.
| |
| − | The enemy were then straddling frequently ; my smoke was
| |
| − | bad; I therefore turned towards the enemy and ran between
| |
| − | the lines, in order to clear the range from smoke nuisance.
| |
| − | :At about 2.35 a.m., four " Deutschland " class ships were
| |
| − | seen bearing West, 4,000 yards. I hauled out to port, firing a
| |
| − | U.S. torpedo at 2.37 G.M.T. No more could be fired as left
| |
| − | tube was empty, and the fore director was pointed skywards
| |
| − | when the sight bore of that tube. Mist and smoke prevented
| |
| − | the enemy being seen again.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Nicator==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Extract from a report submitted to Farie on 4th June.{{UKJutlandOD|pp. 228-9}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <poem>
| |
| − | :At 4.15 p.m. torpedo attack was carried out. Two torpedoes
| |
| − | were fired at a range of about 6,000 yards. During this attack
| |
| − | enemy's Destroyers were continually engaged with gunfire, and
| |
| − | were observed to be retiring, leaving at least two in a disabled
| |
| − | condition. A third torpedo was fired at second ship of enemy's
| |
| − | Battle Fleet at a range of about 3,000 yards. " Nestor " and
| |
| − | " Nicator " continued to close until within about 2,500 yards,
| |
| − | when " Nestor " was hit in the region of No. 1 Boiler Room;
| |
| − | she immediately altered course 8 points to starboard, and
| |
| − | " Nicator " was obliged to alter inside her to avoid collision,
| |
| − | thereby failing to fire a 4th torpedo.
| |
| − | :At 3.30 p.m., June 1st, in Lat. 55.50 N., Long. 0.55 W., a
| |
| − | torpedo fired by a hostile submarine was observed approaching
| |
| − | from abaft the starboard beam at an angle of 30 degrees, running
| |
| − | on the surface; helm was at once put hard a starboard and
| |
| − | telegraphs to full speed. Torpedo passed ahead. On resuming
| |
| − | course a submerged explosion was very distinctly felt all over
| |
| − | the ship, but no damage could be found. Submarine was not
| |
| − | sighted.
| |
| − | </poem>
| |
| | | | |
| | ===July, 1918=== | | ===July, 1918=== |
