Difference between revisions of "River Class Destroyer (1903)"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Armament)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A total of thirty six [[Destroyer|destroyers]] of the '''River Class''' entered service between 1904 and 1909.
+
A total of thirty-six of the '''River Class destroyers''' entered service in the [[Royal Navy]] between 1904 and 1909.  Their displacement (about 550 tons) was much greater than the 350 or so tons that had characterised the 27 and 30 knotters, and which had contributed to their poor handling in anything but a glassy sea.  The "Rivers" also dispensed with the turtleback hulls of their predecessors and offered a greater radius of action.
  
They were designated the "E" class in 1912.{{Conways1860|p. 99}}  {{UK-Eden}}, {{UK-Stour}} and {{UK-Test}} had turbine propulsion; the remainder had the proven V.T.E. engines.
+
Of the "Rivers", {{UK-Eden}}, {{UK-Stour}} and {{UK-Test}} had turbine propulsion; the remainder retained the proven V.T.E. engines.
 +
 
 +
The ships were re-designated the '''"E" Class''' in 1912.{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
  
 
<div name=fredbot:ships>
 
<div name=fredbot:ships>
Line 18: Line 20:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Erne}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Erne}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|3 Jul, 1902
 
|3 Jul, 1902
 
|14 Jan, 1903
 
|14 Jan, 1903
Line 25: Line 27:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Ettrick}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Ettrick}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|9 Jul, 1902
 
|9 Jul, 1902
 
|28 Feb, 1903
 
|28 Feb, 1903
Line 32: Line 34:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Exe}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Exe}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|14 Jul, 1902
 
|14 Jul, 1902
 
|27 Apr, 1903
 
|27 Apr, 1903
Line 39: Line 41:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Ribble}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Ribble}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|4 Jul, 1902
 
|4 Jul, 1902
 
|19 Mar, 1904
 
|19 Mar, 1904
Line 46: Line 48:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Teviot}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Teviot}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|10 Jul, 1902
 
|10 Jul, 1902
 
|7 Nov, 1903
 
|7 Nov, 1903
Line 53: Line 55:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Usk}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Usk}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|30 Jul, 1902
 
|30 Jul, 1902
 
|25 Jul, 1903
 
|25 Jul, 1903
Line 60: Line 62:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Derwent}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Derwent}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|12 Jun, 1902
 
|12 Jun, 1902
 
|14 Feb, 1903
 
|14 Feb, 1903
Line 67: Line 69:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Eden}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Eden}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|12 Jun, 1902
 
|12 Jun, 1902
 
|13 Mar, 1903
 
|13 Mar, 1903
Line 88: Line 90:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Kennet}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Kennet}}
|[[Thornycroft]]
+
|[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]
 
|5 Feb, 1902
 
|5 Feb, 1902
 
|4 Dec, 1903
 
|4 Dec, 1903
Line 95: Line 97:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Jed}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Jed}}
|[[Thornycroft]]
+
|[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]
 
|27 Feb, 1903
 
|27 Feb, 1903
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|16 Feb, 1904
Line 102: Line 104:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Welland}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Welland}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|1 Oct, 1902
 
|1 Oct, 1902
 
|14 Apr, 1904
 
|14 Apr, 1904
Line 109: Line 111:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Cherwell}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Cherwell}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|20 Jan, 1903
 
|20 Jan, 1903
 
|23 Jul, 1903
 
|23 Jul, 1903
Line 116: Line 118:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Dee}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Dee}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|5 Mar, 1903
 
|5 Mar, 1903
 
|10 Sep, 1903
 
|10 Sep, 1903
Line 137: Line 139:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Waveney}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Waveney}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|20 Oct, 1902
 
|20 Oct, 1902
 
|16 Mar, 1903
 
|16 Mar, 1903
Line 144: Line 146:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Chelmer}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Chelmer}}
|[[Thornycroft]]
+
|[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]
 
|11 Dec, 1904
 
|11 Dec, 1904
 
|8 Dec, 1904
 
|8 Dec, 1904
Line 151: Line 153:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Colne}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Colne}}
|[[Thornycroft]]
+
|[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]
 
|21 Mar, 1904
 
|21 Mar, 1904
 
|21 May, 1905
 
|21 May, 1905
Line 158: Line 160:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Gala}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Gala}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|1 Feb, 1904
 
|1 Feb, 1904
 
|7 Jan, 1905
 
|7 Jan, 1905
Line 165: Line 167:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Garry}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Garry}}
|[[Yarrow]]
+
|[[Yarrow & Company]]
 
|25 Apr, 1904
 
|25 Apr, 1904
 
|21 Mar, 1905
 
|21 Mar, 1905
Line 172: Line 174:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Ness}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Ness}}
|[[J. S. White]]
+
|[[J. Samuel White]]
 
|5 May, 1904
 
|5 May, 1904
 
|5 Jan, 1905
 
|5 Jan, 1905
Line 179: Line 181:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Nith}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Nith}}
|[[J. S. White]]
+
|[[J. Samuel White]]
 
|5 May, 1904
 
|5 May, 1904
 
|7 Mar, 1905
 
|7 Mar, 1905
Line 186: Line 188:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Swale}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Swale}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|23 Feb, 1904
 
|23 Feb, 1904
 
|20 Apr, 1905
 
|20 Apr, 1905
Line 193: Line 195:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Ure}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Ure}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|1 Mar, 1904
 
|1 Mar, 1904
 
|25 Oct, 1904
 
|25 Oct, 1904
Line 200: Line 202:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Wear}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Wear}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|7 Mar, 1904
 
|7 Mar, 1904
 
|21 Jan, 1905
 
|21 Jan, 1905
Line 228: Line 230:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Boyne}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Boyne}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|12 Sep, 1904
 
|12 Sep, 1904
Line 235: Line 237:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Doon}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Doon}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|8 Nov, 1904
 
|8 Nov, 1904
Line 242: Line 244:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Kale}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Kale}}
|[[Hawthorn Leslie]]
+
|[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|16 Feb, 1904
 
|8 Nov, 1904
 
|8 Nov, 1904
Line 249: Line 251:
 
|- align=left
 
|- align=left
 
| {{Template:UK-Rother}}
 
| {{Template:UK-Rother}}
|[[Palmer]]
+
|[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]
 
|23 Mar, 1903
 
|23 Mar, 1903
 
|5 Jan, 1904
 
|5 Jan, 1904
Line 270: Line 272:
 
|}
 
|}
 
</div name=fredbot:ships>
 
</div name=fredbot:ships>
==Radio==
 
In 1907 it was decided that all the Rivers (except {{UK-Test}} and {{UK-Stour}}, which were not yet in hand) would be among 42 destroyers (primarily Tribals and Rivers) and ''Swift'' to receive radio equipment fixed to the "D" tune of 700 feet wavelength for transmission and with a Mark II receiver tunable to 8,300 feet.  One P.O. telegraphist would be allowed each ship.  All ships had their mast fitted with a 12 foot yard 60 feet above the water and received the aft end of the aerial by the awning station, but the placement of the wireless office varied as follows.  {{UK-Liffey}}, {{UK-Foyle}}, {{UK-Arun}}, {{UK-Ouse}}, {{UK-Itchen}}, {{UK-Moy}}, {{UK-Blackwater}}, {{UK-Chelmer}}, {{UK-Colne}}, {{UK-Jed}}, {{UK-Kennet}}, {{UK-Wear}}, {{UK-Rother}}, {{UK-Ure}}, {{UK-Exe}}, {{UK-Swale}}, {{UK-Erne}}, {{UK-Ettrick}}, {{UK-Dee}}, {{UK-Cherwell}}, {{UK-Nith}}, {{UK-Ness}}, {{UK-Waveney}}, {{UK-Doon}}, {{UK-Boyne}}, {{UK-Kale}}, {{UK-Derwent}} and {{UK-Eden}} had the office on the bridge with an extended chart house, whereas {{UK-Welland}}, {{UK-Gala}}, {{UK-Ribble}}, {{UK-Teviot}}, {{UK-Garry}} and {{UK-Usk}} had their offices on the upper deck between the mast and fore funnel.
 
 
The short wavelength meant the sets worked less well during the day than at night, and tests between Portsmouth and Portland showed strength 8 by night and 6 by day.  Practical tests with {{UK-Usk}} showed the following strengths over 50 miles of water:{{ARTS1907|Wireless Appendix pp. 32-34}}
 
 
{|border=1
 
!rowspan=2|Wave<br>length||colspan=3|Signal Strengths from/to
 
|-
 
!Large Ship||Scout||T.B.D.
 
|-
 
|align=center|D||align=center|-/6||align=center|-/6||align=center|6/6
 
|-
 
|align=center|R||align=center|8/-||align=center|6/-||align=center|-/-
 
|-
 
|align=center|S||align=center|7/-||align=center|6/-||align=center|-/-
 
|-
 
|align=center|T||align=center|7/-||align=center|5/-||align=center|-/-
 
|-
 
|align=center|U||align=center|6/-||align=center|5/-||align=center|-/-
 
|}
 
 
In 1909, {{UK-Kale}} and {{UK-Colne}} were definitely reported to receive their equipment.{{ARTS1909|Wireless Appendix, p. 25}}
 
 
 
==Armament==
 
==Armament==
  
Line 301: Line 280:
 
* Five Q.F. 6-pdr on Mark I* mountings recoiling 5 inches.  The mounting could elevate 30 degrees, but the sight only 25 degrees (4000 yards).  By 1920, two 6-pdrs had been removed.<ref name=th15/>
 
* Five Q.F. 6-pdr on Mark I* mountings recoiling 5 inches.  The mounting could elevate 30 degrees, but the sight only 25 degrees (4000 yards).  By 1920, two 6-pdrs had been removed.<ref name=th15/>
  
From 1906, the 6-pdrs had been replaced by three 12-pdr 8 cwt guns.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 10}}  An order from March 1913 that special sights provided for these be returned indicates that the 8cwt guns were on G. I* mountings and had telescopic sights.<ref>Admiralty Weekly Orders.  7 Mar, 1913.  {{TNA|ADM 182/4}}.</ref>  Sometime during the war, some of the ships landed two of these 8 cwt weapons to offset the weight of depth charges.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 14}}
+
In 1906 and 1907, the 6-pdrs had been replaced by three additional 12-pdr 8 cwt guns.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 10}}  An order from March 1913 that special sights provided for these be returned indicates that the 8cwt guns were on G. I* mountings and had telescopic sights.<ref>Admiralty Weekly Orders.  7 Mar, 1913.  {{TNA|ADM 182/4}}.</ref>  Sometime during the war, some of the ships landed two of these 8 cwt weapons to offset the weight of depth charges.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 14}}
  
By 1920, the 29 remaining ships had also been fitted with a Q.F. 12-pdr 8 cwt on a converted H.A. mounting.<ref name=th15/>
+
In late-1913, the 12-pdr mountings were equipped with percussion firing gear.{{AWO1913|430 of 1 Aug, 1913}}
 +
 
 +
By 1920, the twenty-nine remaining ships had also been fitted with a Q.F. 12-pdr 8 cwt on a converted H.A. mounting.<ref name=th15/>
  
 
===Torpedoes===
 
===Torpedoes===
 
[[File:ARTS1909Plate15.jpg|thumb|300px| Reload tray for River class.{{ARTS1909|Plate 15}}]]
 
[[File:ARTS1909Plate15.jpg|thumb|300px| Reload tray for River class.{{ARTS1909|Plate 15}}]]
Two single 18-in tubes.
+
* two single 18-in tubes, on the centreline.
  
From 1907, the decision was made to standardise the Rivers and the "A" through "D"s with torpedoes set for short range.  In the case of the Rivers, the torpedo was to be the Mark VI. S.R.{{ARTS1907|p. 32}}
+
From 1907, the decision was made to standardise the Rivers and the "A" through "D"s with torpedoes set for short range.  In the case of the Rivers, the torpedo was to be the [[18-in Mark VI Torpedo (UK)|Mark VI]] S.R..{{ARTS1907|p. 32}}
 +
 
 +
In 1909, as heater torpedo supplies were still growing, these ships were to receive a handsome allotment of six each: [[18-in Mark VII Torpedo (UK)|Mark VII]], [[18-in Mark VII* Torpedo (UK)|Mark VII*]] or [[18-in Weymouth Mark I Torpedo|Weymouth Mark Is]].{{ARTS1909|p. 14}}
  
 
Arrangements were made in 1909 to equip the ships with chocks (for 21-inch Mark I or Mark II torpedoes, curiously) or fixed loading trays (for 18-inch torpedoes) for deck storage of a spare torpedo per tube in time of war.  This may have forecast hopes to switch to 21-inch torpedoes, as {{UK-Waveney}} was testing an experimental 21-inch tube (weight:  2744 pounds), derrick and winch that same year before transferring the equipment to ''Rocket'', the then-tender to ''Vernon''.{{ARTS1909|p. 32}}
 
Arrangements were made in 1909 to equip the ships with chocks (for 21-inch Mark I or Mark II torpedoes, curiously) or fixed loading trays (for 18-inch torpedoes) for deck storage of a spare torpedo per tube in time of war.  This may have forecast hopes to switch to 21-inch torpedoes, as {{UK-Waveney}} was testing an experimental 21-inch tube (weight:  2744 pounds), derrick and winch that same year before transferring the equipment to ''Rocket'', the then-tender to ''Vernon''.{{ARTS1909|p. 32}}
  
In 1916, the torpedo in use was the 18-in Mark VII.{{ARTS1916|p. 87}}
+
In 1916, the torpedo in use was the [[18-in Mark VII Torpedo (UK)|18-in Mark VII]].{{ARTS1916|p. 87}}
  
 
===Other Weapons===
 
===Other Weapons===
 
During the war, along with "A" to D" classes, these ships were given depth charges.  A pair of 12-pdr 8cwt guns were landed in some cases to maintain stability.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 14}}
 
During the war, along with "A" to D" classes, these ships were given depth charges.  A pair of 12-pdr 8cwt guns were landed in some cases to maintain stability.{{UKTHVol4Part34|p. 14}}
 
==Searchlights==
 
The River class were the last British destroyers to use a single searchlight.<ref>''Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915.'', p. 161.</ref>
 
  
 
==Fire Control==
 
==Fire Control==
 
By 1915, at least, these ships had fixed voice pipes installed between decks with the last lengths being flexible (one voice pipe for gunnery, one for torpedoes) fitted between bridge and guns, torpedo tubes, and searchlights.<ref>''Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915.'', p. 150.</ref>
 
By 1915, at least, these ships had fixed voice pipes installed between decks with the last lengths being flexible (one voice pipe for gunnery, one for torpedoes) fitted between bridge and guns, torpedo tubes, and searchlights.<ref>''Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915.'', p. 150.</ref>
  
The ''Technical History and Index'' indicates that destroyers prior to the [[Acorn Class Destroyer (1910)|''Acorn'' class]] relied on a visual system for transmitting fire control information.<ref name=th15>''Technical History and Index'' Vol. 4, Part 34, pp. 15-16.</ref>
+
The ''Technical History and Index'' indicates that destroyers prior to the [[Acorn Class Destroyer (1910)|''Acorn'' class]] relied on a visual system for transmitting fire control information.{{UKTHVol4Part34|pp. 15-16}}
  
===Instruments===
+
By mid-1918, these destroyers were among several earlier classes for which "alarm circuits" were to be fitted.{{ARTS1917|p. 232}}
 
+
===Rangefinders===
+
 
+
===Directors===
+
  
 
==Torpedo Control==
 
==Torpedo Control==
 
In 1907, the ships were to be equipped with [[Fore Bridge Firing Gear]].{{ARTS1907|p. 31}}{{ARTS1906|p. 28. offers further design detail}}  At least some had this upon completion or prior to 1911, though it may have been removed in some later.{{ARTS1916|p. 31}}
 
In 1907, the ships were to be equipped with [[Fore Bridge Firing Gear]].{{ARTS1907|p. 31}}{{ARTS1906|p. 28. offers further design detail}}  At least some had this upon completion or prior to 1911, though it may have been removed in some later.{{ARTS1916|p. 31}}
 +
 +
In 1917, it was approved that "D" through "G" class destroyers should receive firing gongs at the tubes, operated from the bridge.{{ARTS1917|p. 211. (A.L. G. 57852/17; C.I.O. 1705/17.)}}
 +
 +
==Searchlights==
 +
The River class were the last British destroyers to use a single searchlight.<ref>''Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915.'', p. 161.</ref>
 +
 +
==Radio==
 +
In 1907 it was decided that all the Rivers (except {{UK-Test}} and {{UK-Stour}}, which were not yet in hand) would be among 42 destroyers (primarily Tribals and Rivers) and ''Swift'' to receive radio equipment fixed to the "D" tune of 700 feet wavelength for transmission and with a Mark II receiver tunable to 8,300 feet.  One P.O. telegraphist would be allowed each ship.  All ships had their mast fitted with a 12 foot yard 60 feet above the water and received the aft end of the aerial by the awning station, but the placement of the wireless office varied as follows.  {{UK-Liffey}}, {{UK-Foyle}}, {{UK-Arun}}, {{UK-Ouse}}, {{UK-Itchen}}, {{UK-Moy}}, {{UK-Blackwater}}, {{UK-Chelmer}}, {{UK-Colne}}, {{UK-Jed}}, {{UK-Kennet}}, {{UK-Wear}}, {{UK-Rother}}, {{UK-Ure}}, {{UK-Exe}}, {{UK-Swale}}, {{UK-Erne}}, {{UK-Ettrick}}, {{UK-Dee}}, {{UK-Cherwell}}, {{UK-Nith}}, {{UK-Ness}}, {{UK-Waveney}}, {{UK-Doon}}, {{UK-Boyne}}, {{UK-Kale}}, {{UK-Derwent}} and {{UK-Eden}} had the office on the bridge with an extended chart house, whereas {{UK-Welland}}, {{UK-Gala}}, {{UK-Ribble}}, {{UK-Teviot}}, {{UK-Garry}} and {{UK-Usk}} had their offices on the upper deck between the mast and fore funnel.
 +
 +
The short wavelength meant the sets worked less well during the day than at night, and tests between Portsmouth and Portland showed strength 8 by night and 6 by day.  Practical tests with {{UK-Usk}} showed the following strengths over 50 miles of water:{{ARTS1907|Wireless Appendix pp. 32-34}}
 +
 +
{|border=1
 +
!rowspan=2|Wave<br>length||colspan=3|Signal Strengths from/to
 +
|-
 +
!Large Ship||Scout||T.B.D.
 +
|-
 +
|align=center|D||align=center|-/6||align=center|-/6||align=center|6/6
 +
|-
 +
|align=center|R||align=center|8/-||align=center|6/-||align=center|-/-
 +
|-
 +
|align=center|S||align=center|7/-||align=center|6/-||align=center|-/-
 +
|-
 +
|align=center|T||align=center|7/-||align=center|5/-||align=center|-/-
 +
|-
 +
|align=center|U||align=center|6/-||align=center|5/-||align=center|-/-
 +
|}
 +
 +
In 1909, {{UK-Kale}} and {{UK-Colne}} were definitely reported to receive their equipment.{{ARTS1909|Wireless Appendix, p. 25}}
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 +
{{refbegin}}
 
{{WP|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_class_destroyer}}
 
{{WP|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_class_destroyer}}
 +
{{refend}}
  
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==
Line 366: Line 372:
 
name=Erne
 
name=Erne
 
pend=N.58 (1914){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.58 (1914){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Palmer]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
+
builder=[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order=
 
order=
 
laid=3 7 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=3 7 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
Line 402: Line 408:
 
name=Ribble
 
name=Ribble
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Yarrow]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
+
builder=[[Yarrow & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order=1901-02 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order=1901-02 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=4 7 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=4 7 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
Line 438: Line 444:
 
name=Derwent
 
name=Derwent
 
pend=N.25 (1914)<br>D.15 (Sep 1915){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.25 (1914)<br>D.15 (Sep 1915){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
+
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=12 6 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=12 6 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
Line 490: Line 496:
 
name=Kennet
 
name=Kennet
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Thornycroft]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
+
builder=[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order=1902-03 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
order=1902-03 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=5 2 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
 
laid=5 2 1902{{Conways1860|p. 99}}
Line 514: Line 520:
 
name=Welland
 
name=Welland
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Yarrow]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Yarrow & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order=1902-03 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order=1902-03 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=1 10 1902{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=1 10 1902{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 526: Line 532:
 
name=Cherwell
 
name=Cherwell
 
pend=N.90 (1914)<br>D.13 (Sep 1915)<br>D.17 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.90 (1914)<br>D.13 (Sep 1915)<br>D.17 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Palmer]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=20 1 1903{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=20 1 1903{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 574: Line 580:
 
name=Waveney
 
name=Waveney
 
pend=N.79 (1914)<br>D.35 (Sep 1915)<br>D.96 (Jan 1918)<br>H.86 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.79 (1914)<br>D.35 (Sep 1915)<br>D.96 (Jan 1918)<br>H.86 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=20 10 1902{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=20 10 1902{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 586: Line 592:
 
name=Chelmer
 
name=Chelmer
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=unknown{{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Thornycroft]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[John I. Thornycroft & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order=1903-04 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order=1903-04 Programme{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=11 12 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=11 12 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 610: Line 616:
 
name=Gala
 
name=Gala
 
pend=
 
pend=
builder=[[Yarrow]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Yarrow & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=1 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=1 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 634: Line 640:
 
name=Ness
 
name=Ness
 
pend=N.81 (1914)<br>D.26 (Sep 1915)<br>D.59 (Jan 1918)<br>H.77 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.81 (1914)<br>D.26 (Sep 1915)<br>D.59 (Jan 1918)<br>H.77 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[J. S. White]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[J. Samuel White]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=5 5 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=5 5 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 658: Line 664:
 
name=Swale
 
name=Swale
 
pend=N.03 (1914)<br>D.31 (Sep 1915)<br>D.83 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.03 (1914)<br>D.31 (Sep 1915)<br>D.83 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Palmer]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=23 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=23 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 730: Line 736:
 
name=Boyne
 
name=Boyne
 
pend=N.68 (1914)<br>D.12 (Sep 1915)<br>H.23 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.68 (1914)<br>D.12 (Sep 1915)<br>H.23 (Sep 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Hawthorn Leslie & Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order="
 
order="
 
laid=16 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=16 2 1904{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
Line 767: Line 773:
 
name=Rother
 
name=Rother
 
pend=N.32 (1914)<br>D.29 (Sep 1915)<br>D.73 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
 
pend=N.32 (1914)<br>D.29 (Sep 1915)<br>D.73 (Jan 1918){{DittColl|p. 59}}
builder=[[Palmer]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
+
builder=[[Palmer Shipbuilding and Iron Company]]{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
order=Purchased
 
order=Purchased
 
laid=23 3 1903{{Conways1860|p. 100}}
 
laid=23 3 1903{{Conways1860|p. 100}}

Latest revision as of 15:11, 26 May 2019

A total of thirty-six of the River Class destroyers entered service in the Royal Navy between 1904 and 1909. Their displacement (about 550 tons) was much greater than the 350 or so tons that had characterised the 27 and 30 knotters, and which had contributed to their poor handling in anything but a glassy sea. The "Rivers" also dispensed with the turtleback hulls of their predecessors and offered a greater radius of action.

Of the "Rivers", Eden, Stour and Test had turbine propulsion; the remainder retained the proven V.T.E. engines.

The ships were re-designated the "E" Class in 1912.[1]

Armament

Guns

Originally carried the same armament dating back to the "B" class:

  • One 12-pdr 12 cwt on a P. I mounting. The gun recoiled 12 inches and the mounting and its sights were capable of 30 degree elevations (9500 yards).[2]
  • Five Q.F. 6-pdr on Mark I* mountings recoiling 5 inches. The mounting could elevate 30 degrees, but the sight only 25 degrees (4000 yards). By 1920, two 6-pdrs had been removed.[2]

In 1906 and 1907, the 6-pdrs had been replaced by three additional 12-pdr 8 cwt guns.[3] An order from March 1913 that special sights provided for these be returned indicates that the 8cwt guns were on G. I* mountings and had telescopic sights.[4] Sometime during the war, some of the ships landed two of these 8 cwt weapons to offset the weight of depth charges.[5]

In late-1913, the 12-pdr mountings were equipped with percussion firing gear.[6]

By 1920, the twenty-nine remaining ships had also been fitted with a Q.F. 12-pdr 8 cwt on a converted H.A. mounting.[2]

Torpedoes

Reload tray for River class.[7]
  • two single 18-in tubes, on the centreline.

From 1907, the decision was made to standardise the Rivers and the "A" through "D"s with torpedoes set for short range. In the case of the Rivers, the torpedo was to be the Mark VI S.R..[8]

In 1909, as heater torpedo supplies were still growing, these ships were to receive a handsome allotment of six each: Mark VII, Mark VII* or Weymouth Mark Is.[9]

Arrangements were made in 1909 to equip the ships with chocks (for 21-inch Mark I or Mark II torpedoes, curiously) or fixed loading trays (for 18-inch torpedoes) for deck storage of a spare torpedo per tube in time of war. This may have forecast hopes to switch to 21-inch torpedoes, as Waveney was testing an experimental 21-inch tube (weight: 2744 pounds), derrick and winch that same year before transferring the equipment to Rocket, the then-tender to Vernon.[10]

In 1916, the torpedo in use was the 18-in Mark VII.[11]

Other Weapons

During the war, along with "A" to D" classes, these ships were given depth charges. A pair of 12-pdr 8cwt guns were landed in some cases to maintain stability.[12]

Fire Control

By 1915, at least, these ships had fixed voice pipes installed between decks with the last lengths being flexible (one voice pipe for gunnery, one for torpedoes) fitted between bridge and guns, torpedo tubes, and searchlights.[13]

The Technical History and Index indicates that destroyers prior to the Acorn class relied on a visual system for transmitting fire control information.[14]

By mid-1918, these destroyers were among several earlier classes for which "alarm circuits" were to be fitted.[15]

Torpedo Control

In 1907, the ships were to be equipped with Fore Bridge Firing Gear.[16][17] At least some had this upon completion or prior to 1911, though it may have been removed in some later.[18]

In 1917, it was approved that "D" through "G" class destroyers should receive firing gongs at the tubes, operated from the bridge.[19]

Searchlights

The River class were the last British destroyers to use a single searchlight.[20]

Radio

In 1907 it was decided that all the Rivers (except Test and Stour, which were not yet in hand) would be among 42 destroyers (primarily Tribals and Rivers) and Swift to receive radio equipment fixed to the "D" tune of 700 feet wavelength for transmission and with a Mark II receiver tunable to 8,300 feet. One P.O. telegraphist would be allowed each ship. All ships had their mast fitted with a 12 foot yard 60 feet above the water and received the aft end of the aerial by the awning station, but the placement of the wireless office varied as follows. Liffey, Foyle, Arun, Ouse, Itchen, Moy, Blackwater, Chelmer, Colne, Jed, Kennet, Wear, Rother, Ure, Exe, Swale, Erne, Ettrick, Dee, Cherwell, Nith, Ness, Waveney, Doon, Boyne, Kale, Derwent and Eden had the office on the bridge with an extended chart house, whereas Welland, Gala, Ribble, Teviot, Garry and Usk had their offices on the upper deck between the mast and fore funnel.

The short wavelength meant the sets worked less well during the day than at night, and tests between Portsmouth and Portland showed strength 8 by night and 6 by day. Practical tests with Usk showed the following strengths over 50 miles of water:[21]

Wave
length
Signal Strengths from/to
Large Ship Scout T.B.D.
D -/6 -/6 6/6
R 8/- 6/- -/-
S 7/- 6/- -/-
T 7/- 5/- -/-
U 6/- 5/- -/-

In 1909, Kale and Colne were definitely reported to receive their equipment.[22]

See Also

Footnotes

  1. Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. p. 99.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Technical History and Index Vol. 4, Part 34, p. 15.
  3. The Technical History and Index, Vol. 4, Part 34. p. 10.
  4. Admiralty Weekly Orders. 7 Mar, 1913. The National Archives. ADM 182/4.
  5. The Technical History and Index, Vol. 4, Part 34. p. 14.
  6. Admiralty Weekly Order No. 430 of 1 Aug, 1913.
  7. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1909. Plate 15.
  8. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1907. p. 32.
  9. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1909. p. 14.
  10. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1909. p. 32.
  11. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916. p. 87.
  12. The Technical History and Index, Vol. 4, Part 34. p. 14.
  13. Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915., p. 150.
  14. The Technical History and Index, Vol. 4, Part 34. pp. 15-16.
  15. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1917. p. 232.
  16. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1907. p. 31.
  17. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1906. p. 28. offers further design detail.
  18. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916. p. 31.
  19. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1917. p. 211. (A.L. G. 57852/17; C.I.O. 1705/17.).
  20. Manual of Gunnery, Vol. III., 1915., p. 161.
  21. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1907. Wireless Appendix pp. 32-34.
  22. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1909. Wireless Appendix, p. 25.

Bibliography


River Class Destroyer
Erne Ettrick Exe Ribble Teviot
Usk Derwent Eden Foyle Itchen
Kennet Jed Welland Cherwell Dee
Arun Blackwater Waveney Chelmer Colne
Gala Garry Ness Nith Swale
Ure Wear Liffey Moy Ouse
  Boyne Doon Kale  
  Rother Stour Test  
<– "D" Class Destroyers (UK) Tribal Class –>