Difference between revisions of "H.M.S. Conqueror (1911)"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Alterations)
(Captains)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
*Captain [[John William Leopold McClintock|John W. L. McClintock]], 9 April, 1918.<ref>''The Navy List'' (December, 1918).  p. 763.</ref>
 
*Captain [[John William Leopold McClintock|John W. L. McClintock]], 9 April, 1918.<ref>''The Navy List'' (December, 1918).  p. 763.</ref>
 
*Captain [[John Roderick Segrave|John R. Segrave]], 11 January, 1919.<ref>''The Monthly Navy List'' (August, 1919).  p. 763.</ref>
 
*Captain [[John Roderick Segrave|John R. Segrave]], 11 January, 1919.<ref>''The Monthly Navy List'' (August, 1919).  p. 763.</ref>
 +
*Captain [[Cecil Minet Staveley]], 23 November, 1920.<ref>''The Monthly Navy List'', (December 1920).  p. 750.</ref>
 
*Captain [[Robert Cecil Hamilton]], June 1921.{{MackieRNW}}
 
*Captain [[Robert Cecil Hamilton]], June 1921.{{MackieRNW}}
  

Revision as of 13:36, 19 December 2012

H.M.S. Conqueror (1911)
Pendant Number: 06 (1914)
47 (Jan 1918)
95 (Apr 1918)[1]
Builder: Beardmore, Parkhead[2]
Ordered: 1909 Programme[3]
Laid down: 5 Apr, 1910[4]
Launched: 1 May, 1911[5]
Commissioned: 23 Nov, 1912
Sold: 19 Dec, 1922[6]
Fate: Scrapped


Alterations

In late 1913, the ship's captain was asked to report on the merits of a spike that had been fitted to "B" turret's roof in its centre of rotation, intended to serve as a visual cue for the helmsman to find his own ship's bow from the C.T. when not steering by compass.[7] By January, 1914, a favourable report resulted in the Admiralty suggesting the same alteration to other ships with visibility problems from the conning tower where the steering position was on the centreline.[8]

Also in late 1913, the ship landed a Pattern 873 Zeiss stereo spotting telescope Mark II at Portsmouth in order to take on a Ross model of the same pattern for a three-month comparative evaluation.[9]

In October 1914, the ship was to be given 3 Pattern 1582 Electric Radiators to warm cabins whose stoves could not be used for heating them.[10]

Conqueror received a director sometime after the war started but prior to May, 1915.[11]

Jutland

Main article

Conqueror was under the command of Tothill. She reported requiring 16 A.P. shells and 40 common shells after the battle, perhaps indicating her expenditure.[12]

The ship was one of very few which actually forwarded its Dreyer table plot sheets (to vice-Admiral commanding Second Battle Squadron on 2nd October, 1916) for the daylight action, though this may have been somewhat academic, as Tothill's cover letter stated "Very few ranges were taken. Remarks outside of plot are those passed from Foretop to Transmitting Station."[13]

Captains

Dates of appointment are provided when known.

See Also

Footnotes

  1. Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  2. Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  3. Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  4. Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  5. Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  6. Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  7. Admiralty Weekly Order No. 634 of 7 Nov 1913.
  8. Admiralty Weekly Order No. 829 of 23 Jan, 1914.
  9. Admiralty Weekly Order No. 662 of 21 Nov, 1913.
  10. Admiralty Weekly Order No. 512 of 16 Oct, 1914.
  11. The Technical History and Index, Vol. 3, Part 23. pp. 9-10.
  12. Battle of Jutland Official Despatches. p. 522.
  13. Battle of Jutland Official Despatches. p. 522.
  14. The National Archives. ADM 196/42. f. 457.
  15. The Navy List (December, 1914). p. 296.
  16. The Navy List (October, 1915). p. 398c.
  17. The Navy List (October, 1917). p. 392p.
  18. The Navy List (December, 1918). p. 763.
  19. The Monthly Navy List (August, 1919). p. 763.
  20. The Monthly Navy List, (December 1920). p. 750.
  21. Mackie, Colin. ROYAL NAVY WARSHIPS.

Bibliography



Orion Class Dreadnought
  Conqueror Monarch Orion Thunderer  
<– Colossus Class Battleships (UK) King George V Class –>