Search results

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
  • ...and commissioned. Her design also featured the novel elements of turbine propulsion and rendered all other battleships building or in service obsolescent, thus
    32 KB (4,764 words) - 18:02, 11 October 2022
  • ...n No. 7 dock at [[Chatham Royal Dockyard]] on 18 December, 1893. Her main propulsion machinery was constructed by Messrs. John Penn and Son of Greenwich. All h
    12 KB (1,592 words) - 12:11, 7 September 2021
  • ===Propulsion System===
    14 KB (2,120 words) - 07:28, 6 April 2018
  • ...Dockyard]], Captain [[Charles John Balfour|Charles J. Balfour]]. Her main propulsion machinery was provided by Messrs. Maudsley, Sons, and Field of Lambeth.<ref
    11 KB (1,537 words) - 15:52, 21 December 2022
  • ...the Navy in an era when the change from sail to coal as the main means of propulsion meant that a network of bases around the world with coaling facilities or a
    521 B (94 words) - 10:41, 1 August 2007
  • ...that he had patented, and he also occupied himself with experiments on the propulsion of torpedoes by means of rockets. In 1883 he married Katherine (d. 1933), t Parsons's patent of 1884 had referred to steam-turbine propulsion of ships, but it was not until 1894 that he decided to attack this problem.
    13 KB (2,033 words) - 15:07, 20 November 2021
  • ...the startling success of the Japanese torpedo in the second world war. The propulsion system where, in the older cold torpedo the cylinders were water jacketed t propulsion - which is far too wide a subject
    33 KB (5,722 words) - 14:21, 13 November 2012
  • ...2,500. Cost was expected to be £150,186 in total, including £54,410 for propulsion and £7,597 for guns.<ref>"Launch Of A Cruiser." ''The Times'' (London, En
    3 KB (418 words) - 11:15, 17 May 2018
  • ...ft & Company]] in order to test the Ruthven "turbine", a type of water-jet propulsion.
    2 KB (213 words) - 13:29, 6 April 2018
  • ...s opposed to the earlier norm of [[Vertical Triple Expansion Engine|V.T.E. propulsion]]. ==Turbine Propulsion==
    4 KB (557 words) - 14:08, 24 November 2014
  • ...rbine propulsion]] as opposed to [[Vertical Triple Expansion Engine|V.T.E. propulsion]].
    2 KB (237 words) - 17:42, 11 June 2015
  • |Propulsion:
    2 KB (303 words) - 09:25, 13 November 2019
  • ...n's'' and 30.6 per cent, of ''Pearl's'' weight are respectively devoted to propulsion.
    38 KB (6,359 words) - 03:31, 26 February 2014
  • Of the "Rivers", {{UK-Eden}}, {{UK-Stour}} and {{UK-Test}} had turbine propulsion; the remainder retained the proven V.T.E. engines.
    22 KB (2,771 words) - 15:11, 26 May 2019
  • * Modern Air-Independent Propulsion Equipped Submarines, by Conrad Waters
    67 KB (10,060 words) - 07:02, 9 December 2023
  • ...02}} The cause of these delays was the decision to employ a hydraulic jet propulsion system instead of a conventional power plant.{{LyonWinfieldSteamList|p. 309
    9 KB (1,344 words) - 12:11, 25 April 2018
  • (23) Inventions relating to ship propulsion, shipbuilding materials, armour and equipment.
    10 KB (1,579 words) - 15:14, 8 December 2018
  • ...the reputation of the preceding class, which was known for its problematic propulsion systems. When {{UK-1Antelope}} was being worked up in 1891, ''The Times''
    8 KB (902 words) - 09:00, 16 August 2018
  • This class was reviled for its problematic propulsion systems. When {{UK-1Antelope}} was being worked up in 1891, ''The Times''
    9 KB (1,030 words) - 08:59, 16 August 2018
  • One of five large frigates with auxiliary steam propulsion ordered on 6 April, 1854.{{BauerRobertsRegister|p. 55}} ''Colorado'' and h
    3 KB (393 words) - 15:53, 6 April 2022

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)